| Pattern | Interpretation | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| L1 strong, L2 strong, L3 weak | Transfer environment problem — training worked; workplace didn't support application | |
| L1 strong, L2 weak | Content-learning gap — content was relevant but instructional approach didn't build capability | |
| L1 weak, L2 weak | Relevance failure — content did not connect to learner challenges | |
| L1–L3 strong, L4 not moving | Theory of change was wrong — right behaviors, wrong outcomes targeted | |
| All levels strong | Program working as designed |
| Stakeholder | Report Name | Key Metrics Included | Format | Frequency | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CS Leadership | |||||
| CS Managers | |||||
| Enablement Team | |||||
| Finance / CFO | |||||
| Program Sponsors |